Brick vs Foqos:
a required device or your own tag

Both use physical distance as friction, but Brick sells you the object and Foqos lets you supply it yourself, for free. The philosophy is the same; the cost and commitment are not.

Brick and Foqos both believe a physical object, placed with intention, creates friction a screen alone can't. Where they diverge is ownership and cost. Brick sells a specific $59 device required for every unlock. Foqos is free and open-source, built to work with NFC tags or QR codes you already have, or with no physical object at all through manual and timer activation.

This page compares the two products directly. For how Brick stacks up against Fella specifically, see Fella vs Brick, or read on for where Fella fits as a third, hardware-free option.

What mattersBrickFoqos
HardwareProprietary Brick device required, $59 one-time purchaseFree, open-source; works with any NFC tag or QR code you supply, or no hardware at all
App costIncluded in the $59 hardware purchase, lifetime access, no subscriptionFree; only payment is a voluntary $1.99 developer tip
Activation methodsTap your phone to the physical BrickManual, NFC-tag, QR-code, or timer activation
Session endingTap the Brick again to unbrickTimer, a 'smart break,' or a second tap, depending on setup
PrivacyAccount requiredNo account, no ads, no tracking; data stays on-device
AnalyticsFocus Insights: average Brick time, session length, week/month/lifetime comparisonsNo usage limits or analytics depth documented
PlatformsiOS and Android phones only; no desktop appUses Apple's Screen Time APIs for app and website blocking

Brick vs Foqos at a glance

Both products lean on the same core idea: distance from a physical object changes behavior in a way a software toggle can't. Brick commits fully with a required proprietary device. Foqos offers the same philosophy as a free, flexible, bring-your-own-hardware system.

A required proprietary device versus your own tag

Brick's device is the entire product. There's no substitute and no alternative activation method, tapping the physical Brick is the only way to start or end a block, which is precisely the commitment some people want.

Foqos doesn't require you to buy anything from it at all. It's built to work with NFC tags or QR codes you already own or source separately, and it also supports manual and timer-based activation for people who don't want a physical object involved at every step.

That flexibility changes the cost equation entirely. Brick's $59 is fixed and required. Foqos can cost nothing beyond an optional tip, or the price of a generic NFC tag you buy yourself, often just a few dollars.

Bypass resistance depends on setup for both

Brick's resistance is built into the requirement itself. Unbricking normally needs the physical Brick, full stop, with 5 Emergency Unbricks as a documented fallback if the device isn't available, resettable through a support form.

Foqos's resistance is entirely a function of where you place your own tag. A tag left on the desk offers weak resistance since it's always within reach. A tag left in another room creates real friction, the same principle as Brick, but entirely dependent on your own setup discipline rather than a built-in requirement.

Neither guarantees strictness on its own. Brick's requirement is fixed, but Foqos's manual and timer activation modes offer no physical friction at all if you choose to use them that way, an important distinction if strictness is the priority.

Which one is better for whom

Choose Brick if you want a single, non-negotiable physical requirement. Its proprietary device removes the option to fall back to something easier, which is exactly the point for someone who's found alternatives too easy to skip.

Choose Foqos if you want the same philosophy for free, with more flexibility. Its open-source, no-account, no-tracking model and support for tags you already own make it a lower-cost, more adaptable starting point.

Consider Foqos's analytics gap if tracking matters to you. Brick's Focus Insights document average Brick time and session comparisons. Foqos's current documentation doesn't include equivalent analytics depth.

At a glanceFellaBrick / Foqos
Hardware requiredNoYes, proprietary (Brick); optional, bring-your-own (Foqos)
Core approachSelected apps blocked by defaultPhysical unlock, device required (Brick) or optional (Foqos)
Cost$9.99 monthly or $34.99 yearly$59 one-time (Brick); free, optional $1.99 tip (Foqos)
Emergency accessOne 5-minute unlock per session, every session5 Emergency Unbricks total (Brick); depends on setup (Foqos)

Where Fella fits as a third option

Brick and Foqos both use physical friction, one as a requirement, one as an option. That's genuinely effective for people who respond to real-world distance more than any app setting, whichever cost model fits them better.

Fella stays entirely in software, with no object of any kind involved. Selected iPhone apps stay blocked by default, enforced through Apple's Screen Time frameworks, with one 5-minute emergency unlock per session and nothing to buy, tap, or place.

The right pick depends on whether a physical object is genuinely what works for you. If distance from a real object is the mechanism you trust, Brick or Foqos is worth the setup, whichever cost model suits you. If you want strictness without any hardware, that's the gap Fella is built for. See how Fella works or current pricing.

Fella, up close.

Fella, up close.

  • Built with Apple’s Screen Time controls.
  • One 5-minute emergency unlock per session.
  • Apps stay blocked by default.
Fella Home screen showing focus routines and session lengths

Brick vs Foqos FAQ

Own Your Attention
Starting Right Now